The Bull Elephant
  • Home
  • About The Bull Elephant
  • Fun Stuff
  • Contact The Bull Elephant
Latest Posts
State Central Committee votes to remove agenda item
Jennifer Lewis Doxxes People Who She Wanted to...
Letter to State Central Committee
Former Governor George Allen Endorses Jason Miyares for...
Is the Republic Lost?
Joint Statement on the condemnation of violence and...
State Central Committee to vote AGAIN on convention...

The Bull Elephant

  • Home
  • About The Bull Elephant
  • Fun Stuff
  • Contact The Bull Elephant

AG Mark Herring Violated His Official and Ethical Duty

written by Guest Poster Pat McSweeney April 24, 2014
Attorney General Mark Herring

Attorney General Mark Herring

In a friend-of-court brief filed in the federal appellate court considering the constitutionality of the Marriage Amendment to the Virginia Constitution, three law professors contend that Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring was justified in taking a position in that litigation that the Marriage Amendment violates the U.S. Constitution. Herring did so despite his campaign pledge not to subordinate the position of the Commonwealth to his personal view of the law. The professors fail to acknowledge that fact, as well as several others.

They fail to appreciate the fact that the Commonwealth and an overwhelming majority of voters who ratified the Marriage Amendment have been denied representation in the federal litigation. Herring had an obligation to these Virginians and to the General Assembly, which submitted the proposition to the voters in 2006, to assure that their position was vigorously defended. Instead, he exalted his personal view on the issue over their interests. The professors overlook the limitation of an attorney general’s powers and duties under Virginia law. The Virginia Constitution provides that an attorney general exercises only those powers and duties prescribed by law. Although an attorney general is elected directly by the people, that office has no inherent powers, as the Virginia Supreme Court made clear in 1994. He has no authority to participate in litigation as an opponent of the Commonwealth.

The brief filed by the professors assume that an attorney general has an obligation to oppose a state constitutional provision when the federal law in question has not yet been settled. In this case, Herring’s decision was based on his personal view that the U. S. Supreme Court will resolve the unsettled issue against the Commonwealth. There is a fundamental difference
between any state official’s responsibility to obey a settled rule of federal law and that official’s authority to take a position contrary to the Commonwealth’s position based upon the official’s personal view as to how the unresolved legal issue will be settled.

Repeatedly, the professors confuse an attorney general’s right to decline to represent the Commonwealth when he has grave doubt about the legality of its position with his right to go further and take a position contrary to the interests of his client. The General Assembly enacted a statute in 1976 to deal with the situation where an attorney general concludes that he cannot represent the Commonwealth in a particular matter. It authorizes him to withdraw and appoint special counsel for that purpose. Under rules of professional ethics, a lawyer must represent his client with zeal. If he cannot do so, as Herring concluded in this case, ethics demand that he recuse himself and appoint special counsel. The Virginia statute assures that the Commonwealth will be zealously represented even when an attorney general declines to do so.

The professors’ bias toward federal power at the expense of state prerogative is palpable. They are content with a process in which the personal view of a single state official can frustrate the will of a majority of voters in the Commonwealth and deny them a vigorous defense of a provision of their fundamental law. If the professors’ position is accepted, it will severely erode our constitutional scheme of federalism by tilting litigation against states that are unable to defend their laws.

While every state official may have a duty to obey federal law, Herring had a duty in accordance with his oath to defend the Virginia Constitution and under state statute to defend the Marriage Amendment or to appoint someone who would do so until the pending challenge is resolved by the U. S. Supreme Court. He violated his oath, the Virginia statute and rules of professional responsibility by asserting a litigation position that is contrary to the interests of his clients – the people of Virginia who are, after all, the Commonwealth.

AG Mark Herring Violated His Official and Ethical Duty was last modified: April 24th, 2014 by Guest Poster Pat McSweeney
#VAAGAttorney GeneralMark Herringmarriage amendmentPat McSweeneyunconstitutional
4 comments
Guest Poster Pat McSweeney

Patrick McSweeney is a constitutional lawyer and past chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia from 1992-1996. He has served in a variety of positions at the United States Department of Justice and for state commissions and a state agency. McSweeney was a leader in the 2006 referendum battle to win approval of the Marriage Amendment to the Virginia Constitution. Pat received his undergraduate education from the University of Virginia and his law degree in 1968 from the University of Richmond, where he was editor-in-chief of the University of Richmond Law Review. He has four adult children. He has resided with his wife, Wendy, in Powhatan County, Virginia for more than 35 years.

Your life will be better if you click one of these

State Central Committee votes to remove agenda...

January 16, 2021

Jennifer Lewis Doxxes People Who She Wanted...

January 15, 2021

Letter to State Central Committee

January 14, 2021

Former Governor George Allen Endorses Jason Miyares...

January 14, 2021

Is the Republic Lost?

January 14, 2021

Joint Statement on the condemnation of violence...

January 13, 2021

State Central Committee to vote AGAIN on...

January 13, 2021

Va. gov flouts law, leaves GOP Senate...

January 12, 2021

Special Election scheduled to fill Senator Chafin’s...

January 12, 2021

Will Democrats use mob assault of Capitol...

January 12, 2021

Fun Stuff

  • This week’s memes, Buffalo Man edition

  • This week in Memes–Happy New Year edition

  • Sunday Memes–Stimulus edition

  • Sunday Memes, Dr. Who?

  • Salaries of Virginia state employees 2020

Advertisement

Advertisement

Sign Up for Email Alerts

Select list(s):

Advertisement

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2017 Bull Elephant Media LLC.


Back To Top