The Bull Elephant
  • Home
  • About The Bull Elephant
  • Fun Stuff
  • Contact The Bull Elephant
Latest Posts
We’re on the eve of Socialism
Why I supported a convention and why we...
Letter to the General Assembly
Vague, confusing ‘workplace harassment’ bill is back in...
Kenneth McDuff
State Central Committee to vote AGAIN for primary...
Chuck Smith for Attorney General announces fundraising totals

The Bull Elephant

  • Home
  • About The Bull Elephant
  • Fun Stuff
  • Contact The Bull Elephant

Is a Convention Necessary to Provide Options in the Republican Presidential Primary?

written by Paul A. Prados March 11, 2015

As pointed out by Ms. Martin, Chris Beer has posted an article on why a convention is necessary for the Republican presidential nomination in Virginia in 2016.  I disagree on all his major points: [read_more]

  1. He prefers a primary: I prefer a convention.
  2. He thinks VA presidential primary ballot access rules are too onerous: I think Virginia should vet weak or disorganized campaigns.
  3. He thinks a convention is necessary to allow voters to have variety; I think a convention is unnecessary to provide variety.
Photo Credit: AP

Photo Credit: AP

Read items one and three again.

I like Chris Beer.  He and I agree on most things.  Still, I have no idea why he is making excuses for potential 2016 nominees in advance.  Everything stems from the fallout of the 2012 Presidential primary on the Republican side where two viable candidates as of December 2011 were excluded from the ballot, former Gov. Rick Perry and former speaker Newt Gingrich.  Only two candidates made it on to the Virginia ballot former Gov. Mitt Romney and former Representative Ron Paul.  Virginia conservatives were livid and made every accusation under the sun against Virginia’s ballot access system, against RPV, and against the Romney supporters. As I pointed out back in December 2011 the ballot access system for major party presidential primaries is somewhat convoluted.  Nonetheless, the presidential campaigns had five months, starting July 1, 2011, to gather 10,000 valid signatures with at least 400 in each congressional district.   This amount was not too onerous as pointed out back in 2011 (by my friend Brian S. – no endorsement implied):

. . . plenty of other candidates with fewer resources have made it onto the Virginia presidential primary ballot since the rules were loosened in 1999.

Here’s a quick list: 2008 – Barack Obama, Dennis Kucinich, Hillary Clinton, Bill Richardson, Joe Biden, John Edwards; Ron Paul, John McCain, Fred Thompson, Mike Huckabee, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney.

2004 – Al Sharpton, John Kerry, Wesley Clark, Howard Dean, Joe Lieberman, John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich, Dick Gephardt, Lyndon Larouche.

2000 – Alan Keyes, Gary Bauer, George W. Bush, John McCain, Steve Forbes.

Moreover, in the comments section of Mr. Beer’s post Greg Aldridge explained how his candidate, E.W. Jackson for Senate, obtained ballot access.  Additionally TBE’s own Jamie Radtke ably did so that same year.

No mercy should be spared these candidates who couldn’t meet the same standards as Lyndon Larouche.

But the law has changed, doesn’t it make it less fair? NO The law has changed in a major way since late 2011/early 2012. The signature requirement has been reduced to half of the previous amount by bipartisan legislation in 2013.  Candidates need merely obtain 5000 signatures and 200 from each Congressional District. Additionally the residency requirement for signature gatherers was thrown into serious doubt by two Supreme Court decisions in 2011 analyzing Colorado law.

In short, primary ballot access in Virginia was not that difficult in 2011/2012, it has been made easier, and holding a primary should not restrict viable options for Republican voters. Whether we should have a convention is an entirely different question.

Is a Convention Necessary to Provide Options in the Republican Presidential Primary? was last modified: March 12th, 2015 by Paul A. Prados
Conventionpresident 2016primary
4 comments
Paul A. Prados

Having fallen prey to the allure of DC politics in college, Paul escaped only to make the similar judgment error of going to law school. Trained at the side of a sitting state Senator, Paul is now the owner of a law firm in Reston, Virginia. In previous years Paul built a base of support on Twitter @ppradoslaw and founded and wrote for a blog on Virginia politics and legal procedure northernvirginialawyer.blogspot.com. As a pro-life libertarian, Paul finds himself at home within the broader conservative movement, and believes in a big tent Republican Party. In May 2016 Paul was elected as Chairman of the 11th Congressional District Republican Committee. Paul resides in western Fairfax County with his wife and children.

Your life will be better if you click one of these

We’re on the eve of Socialism

January 19, 2021

Why I supported a convention and why...

January 19, 2021

Letter to the General Assembly

January 19, 2021

Vague, confusing ‘workplace harassment’ bill is back...

January 19, 2021

Kenneth McDuff

January 18, 2021

State Central Committee to vote AGAIN for...

January 18, 2021

Chuck Smith for Attorney General announces fundraising...

January 18, 2021

At the current rate it will take...

January 18, 2021

McAuliffe outraises all other candidates combined in...

January 17, 2021

Virginia legislators move to abolish life without...

January 17, 2021

Fun Stuff

  • We’re on the eve of Socialism

  • This week’s memes, Buffalo Man edition

  • This week in Memes–Happy New Year edition

  • Sunday Memes–Stimulus edition

  • Sunday Memes, Dr. Who?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Sign Up for Email Alerts

Select list(s):

Advertisement

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2017 Bull Elephant Media LLC.


Back To Top