In what is now regarded as an epic Internet smackdown of racial grievance mongers, Ben Shapiro explained how contemporary black American culture accounts for much of the differences in wealth between black and white Americans rather than “racism.” In doing so, Shapiro, the right-wing Lion of Zion, pointed to the high rates of out-of-wedlock births that have decimated generations in many black communities throughout our country. The only retort offered by the opposing side in explaining the wealth differential was, “It has to be racism. It just has to be.”
In a way, one cannot blame Shapiro’s opponents. Racism is often the ONLY explanation offered by leftists when they explain the varying levels of education, wealth, and poverty between whites and people of color (Asians do not count). Indeed, the impact, effects, and legacy of slavery and Jim Crow do account for some portion of the wealth differential between white and black America. Any honest person would admit as much. But Shapiro correctly pointed out that there are other factors – that are more important – at play. And when it comes to dealing with these factors, liberals are blind, deaf, and close mindedly dumb.
The hard truth for fanatical egalitarians on the Left to swallow is that there have always been – and there always will be – disparate outcomes among demographic groups. For example, most of the Hispanics and Asians living in our country today are either immigrants, or the children of immigrants. And yet, Asian American students dramatically outperform their Hispanic counterparts and go on to earn considerably more money than Hispanics. In fact, there is not a single school district in the US in which Hispanic students are on par with Asian students. Why? “It has to be racism. It just has to be.”
Even in leftist enclaves, such as that paragon of progressive paradise, California, Asian students, in comparison with Hispanic students, are dramatically overrepresented at the University of California and in the state’s other prestigious colleges and universities. Why? Particularly when there are far more Hispanic students than Asian students in the Golden State. “It has to be racism.” It just has to be.”
In liberal New York, my hometown, a kerfuffle has arisen concerning the low numbers of black and Hispanic students attending the city’s three prestigious high schools – Stuyvesant (my alma mater), Brooklyn Technical, and Bronx High School of Science. Tragically, as the liberals tell it, Asian students, who are only 16% of the student population in the Big Apple, account for nearly 2/3 of the student body at these elite schools (which require an entrance examination to attend). “It has to be racism. It just has to be.”
Never underestimate the ability of liberals in their delusions to defiantly deny damaging demographic data. In their reflexive and instinctive urge to play the racism and classism cards, progressives in The Big Apple are claiming that black and Hispanic students come from families that cannot afford to take the tutoring available to prepare for the rigorous admissions test. Liberals insist that only the rich and privileged can take this tutoring, leaving poorer blacks and Hispanic students behind. Not quite. 60% of the (predominantly Asian) students who attend these elite high schools are eligible for the school lunch program, once again demonstrating that the racism and classism cards played incessantly by liberals are jokers. Liberals simply cannot deal with reality. Most of these elite Asian students are working class immigrants or the children of immigrants and not the scions of the elite and pampered. But then again, we can always count on our liberal friends to utter those words they have come to cherish and apply for every bit of data that runs counter to their worldview. “It has to be racism.” It just has to be.”
One last point. Not only are there disparate socio-economic outcomes between the races, but among them as well. For example, Americans of Chinese, Korean, and Japanese ancestry have higher levels of education and income than Asians from Philippines and southeast Asia. Among Caucasians, Ashkenazi (European) Jews, dramatically outperform every white ethnic group in levels of academic achievement and affluence. And even among Jews, there are significant disparate socio-economic outcomes between the Ashkenazi and middle-eastern, or Mizrahi Jews. Why? “It has to be racism. It just has to be.”
36 comments
The Corey Stewart GOP strikes again.
So you all blame out of wedlock birth for lower levels of wealth among blacks then? If that is true there must be a general correlation between overall rates of out of wedlock births and rates of poverty in the general population. Please then explain these graphs. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/67eef4512507de08aa945204f58ffb54d3faafe6f44cdb40a8e1e7673dc7d1ac.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e37f6e8c34b781cc6653c2de076f1119638f130a25e1837b30202a807a11cf40.jpg
“So you all blame out of wedlock birth for lower levels of wealth among blacks then? If that is true there must be a general correlation between overall rates of out of wedlock births and rates of poverty in the general population.”
Really?
A statistical reality in a subset of the population does not mean there must be a general correlation to the whole population. A lot of movie stars have children out of wedlock. If I showed you a graph of movie stars with out of wedlock children at 0% poverty level would that imply that the general population with out of wedlock children must correlate to 0% poverty rate?
Your graphs are also failing to make your point. After trillions of dollars have been spent since Lyndon Johnson’s so-called War on Poverty the official poverty measure is the same today as it was in 1966, about 15%. Why hasn’t all that money helped lift more people out of poverty? One legitimate idea would be the propensity of poor people (of all races) to have children out of wedlock which often results in one-parent or no-parent families. This, in turn, results in children with inadequate parental supervision who don’t focus on education and end up as another generation of poor people.
If the cause has no racial component then the trend would be true in the general population as well. It’s not. Quite the opposite. Decreasing poverty correlates with increasing out of wedlock births – even in Hollywood.
Please explain how one income families make more money that two income families. Even you must see that makes no sense.
Jeanine – your typical white liberal would rather eat a manure sandwich than admit that a conservative is right about anything. It is simply not in their DNA.
There there may be a difference in income between one and two working parent families. This clearly, however, does not lead to increased poverty in the population due to an increase in out of wedlock births. Perhaps there are other factors at play…
1)Doesn’t illegal immigration and the exploitation of these immigrants have a harmful effect on single and two parent working households ( black, white, brown) in America?
2)How come Dems don’t ever talk of the exploitation of illegal immigrants?
Why do you think race is the only factor to consider? I believe that out of wedlock births help keep poor people poor – regardless of race – for generations at a time. Why is this a hard concept? Go to the all white trailer parks in SouthWest Virginia and tell me what you see. I completely believe that wealthy people (like movie stars) can have out of wedlock births without increasing their odds of falling below the poverty line. I further believe that poor people of all races increase their chances of staying poor by having out of wedlock babies.
Statistical significance is an important mathematical concept. You really can’t extrapolate from a small and isolated subset to the census of data points. Nor can you look at the census and make assumptions about statistically insignificant samples.
Honestly, you can’t. If you go to a Washington Wizards game and observe that a large percentage of the players are both African-American and very tall – what does that tell you about society as a whole? Nothing. It does not infer that all African-Americans are tall. It does not infer that if African-Americans in the general population are, on average, of average height that the Wizards are of average height.
I respect your willingness to use facts and figures to make your point. I really do. I just think you’re off base here.
Neither the African American population nor the US population as a whole are small isolated populations. If you wish to argue causation in the African American population, you must first establish correlation. Basic logic.
And you don’t even see a correlation between out of wedlock births and poverty rates within the black community, either. As out of wedlock birth rates rise, poverty goes down. See below
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6d004042c75283a1ab3d907fa05a2f0ed57045b7d21dea12f6fcfbb004c6c4cf.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3467730d9db49d75fce0bb90a4b6605f0259731d2b42d8b1d83c946fb0fc5f3e.jpg
That’s absurd, out of wedlock births cause poverty. Nearly 40% of children born to single mothers grow up on welfare. With two parents, it’s less than 4%. Do the math, two parents, twice the income. Duh.
What a shame that so many Blacks haven’t figured this out and continue to be the group with the most out of wedlock births, condemning all those children to poverty and all the other problems that come from having only one parent.
Hey Genius. The article is talking about INCOME and WEALTH, not levels of poverty. Do you get that? Besides, although I am not an expert, I suspect the federal and state governments provide enough of handouts to likely lift single parent families above the poverty level. But the takeway point is that SINGLE PARENT “families” are much more likely to be dependent on government largesse. But that is your endgame after all, isn’t it? Diversity, Dependence, Dictatorship. You are not as clever as you think you are. But then again, you are a leftist.
The statistic you provided above is just your typically expected shullbit to obfuscate and detract from the issues addressed by this article. Why don’t you explain just why Asians, who last time I looked are not white, do SO MUCH better academically than Hispanics, many of whom are white or predominantly white? C’mon Genius. I cannot wait to here your floundering and flailing excuse. No better yet. I know exactly what you will say. You will (yawn) call me a racist and state this issue is not worth your time.
Why don’t you explain what you think you see in the stats? Is it so hard for you to believe the system is harder on some groups than others?
Since I grew up working class and white in a low income housing project that was predominantly Puerto Rican, I am very familiar with the struggles of the welfare and working poor. So, i will meet you halfway. Yes, I agree with you that if you grew up with no father and you had no good adult role models, nd you attended a school which was chaotic and alliwed the inmates to run the asylum, then you are starting life with a disadvantage. No doubt about that.
Given how low the comparative rate of poverty is between white and black communities (as you are wont to point out like every other post), what you are describing above is textbook white privilege.
It is not white privilege as you imply but rather blacks are suffering from the consequences of a disastrous welfare system put in place by white liberals that has produced a culture that does not lead to success in a 21st century first world society. That was what Shapiro maintained all along.
I am not privileged. I sweated for and earned everything I have. And it is funny, because perhaps the one thing that could save many black kids trapped in the ghetto – decent school choice for poor parents – is the very thing progressives oppose the most.
I really think progressives are very happy with the status quo of Black America – Dependency and a very reliable voting bloc. And to avoid any responsibility for their disastrous policies, they have to conjure up shullbit like white privilege and implicit bias. It’s just a smokescreen.
Ahhh, so now poverty is caused by welfare spending. Let’s look for the correlation, shall we. We have already established that poverty has been on the decline since 1960. Here is the US welfare spending as a % of GDP by year. Looks to me like we once again have a reverse correlation between welfare spending and poverty rates. Care to try again? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/74aa156592364760d12e2c335d62a3c4e500be89f8aac2b6ef5d9e6c3bf99540.jpg
I asked you first so you answer the question. Why do YOU think Asians do so much better than Hispanics? You cannot refute that fact, because if you could, or thought you could, you would have done so. And you cannot blame it on slavery, Jim Crow, white bias, white privilege, or the other shullbit excuses you leftists pull out of your excuse-monger quiver of rhetorical arrows. So I am just dying to hear your explanation on this one.
Interestingly, the stats you claim are not nearly clear cut. Immigrant poverty rate by origin: Mexico – 22%, Central America – 20%, South America – 13%, South and East Asia – 12%, Middle East – 22%, Sub-Saharan Africa – 19%, Europe/Canada – 9%. So what do you know?
So the ranking of overall poverty rates by race go Black, Hispanic, Asian, White. You really don’t believe that there is a racial bias in America which prefers Asians over Hispanics and Hispanics over Blacks? Pretty clear there is.
Your “analysis” and line of thinking give ample justification to my having totally written off any potential chance for meaningful conversation with progressives on race and ethnicity and religion. How old are you? Maybe one day you will be red pilled but until that day comes, there is not much hope for you. Because like most lefties, you have not yet grasped the basic concept of cause and effect. So, you really think there is racial bias (by whitey of course) that is responsible for Asians significantly outperforming Hispanics? Why do you think that is so, since Hispanics are more closely aligned racially to whites than Asians? And how does this bias play out in the classroom?
It is not about who are “racially aligned” (whatever that made up term is), it is simply which race is where in our own social caste system. But, hey, you keep telling yourself there is no such thing as racism in our country today if it makes you feel better. Maybe you can blame on non-white “culture”.
If you don’t think there are cultures that value education more than others, than you were not raised in an Ashkenazi Jewish household. I was.
You are a textbook victim of culture relativism and Herbert Marcuse of the Frankfurt School. To you, the only bad cultures are the ones that white people have erected. You just cannot bring yourself go criticize non westetn cultures. And there is much to criticize.
The welfare system designed by the Democrat party was designed to destroy the family unit and keep people dependent on government. This allows the government to control people. It is the modern day plantation. Go see Death of a Nation it will connect the dots of the various issues happening today. The Democrat party of slavery has not changed they only evolved to hide their aims to destroy and control people. Now the Democrat party has resorted to full on fascist operations, antifa the black shirt henchmen much like Mussolini’s brown shirts they are there to suppress and beat down the opposition! Now social media is fully conspiring together to execute the bidding of the democrat party and are committing a ritualized version of book burning as done unit NAZI rule via facebook, and twitter banning of accounts. Twitter has Shadow banned several GOP candidates and if you support trump and have over 2k followers combined with supporting the NRA there is a good chance you are also shadow banned! All I can say is how much more destruction will happen when and if the domestic terrorist party aka Democrat party gains power again. Only play they haven’t used from the Fascist playbook is reeducation/concentration/death camps! I personally never thought I would see the day that social media would make war via suppression of free speech!
So GOP win or be prepared for the worst!
This was sent to me on how to check your twitter account! https://shadowban.eu/
If you are banned put a Red X emoji in your twitter name please!
Yes, it will make it that much easier to round up the technologically savvy dissidents first.
Yes, and it makes one appreciate even more the achievements of people like Ben Carson, Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas, et al. For Black Americans to think independently and overcome their environmental culture, they must question nearly everything they’ve been taught about the world, and they must question the universal political view held by nearly all their friends and family. It isn’t surprising we have vast under-achievement in the community. What is amazing is that some people still emerge successfully despite all the misguided influences of the culture.
It no longer works because he who screams it all s by far the most racist.
I’m surprised you didn’t mention Sarah Jeong being protected by the New York Times, Twitter, and other progressives for her long history of anti-white racist tweets.
Apples and oranges.
New York City?!?!?
This pop reference only
made sense when it looked like Jeanine wrote the article and she gre up in NYC…. Different timeline.
I got the salsa reference. 🙂
But people keep voting for them