It is as predictable as it is maddening. Like Fort Hood, Boston, and many other incidents in the U.S. – not to mention thousands worldwide – yesterday’s murders by jihadists in San Bernardino were not out of the ordinary, it is what one should expect.
Yet after every deadly event, experts explain that violence isn’t part of “real” Islam; politicians ignore their own policies that have encouraged unchecked immigration; and the apologists for multiculturalism claim that obvious failure isn’t failure.
But the truth is an obstinate thing – reality bites hard.
Islam itself propagates Radical Islam. The very clear words of Mohammad as captured in the Qur’an and the compelling authoritarianism of sharia law drives the violence of a sizable minority of Muslims. And the willingness to employ violence always silences the majority.
Now the West, including the U.S., find themselves defending the indefensible, and having to justify the importation of millions of people, a portion of whom have little interest of integrating with the host nation’s culture except for benefits, while others preach openly that they intend to force the host to Islam.
San Bernardino has occurred only weeks after Paris, while Congress ponders the President’s intention of taking 10,000 to 100,000 Syrian refugees, opposed by a large majority of Americans, but supported by a powerful political coalition of both parties’ elites, in league with mega-refugee resettlement charities that control hundreds of millions in taxpayer money to direct the programs.
The Islamic State has already said that the refugees will be “seeded” with jihadists, and the U.S. government possess almost no meaningful way to verify who these refugees are (in Europe, over 85% are young, fighting age men, not families. Over 97% are Muslim.)
The American public has it right; stop all refugee resettlement except for persecuted Christians.
After San Bernardino, where is the Virginia Congressional delegation? Where is Northern Virginia Republican Comstock?
8 comments
You never let the facts stop you from writing crap like this.
The article seemed pretty factual, where was he wrong?
The typical Mike Giere fearmongering crap. He never comes back to defend his writings.
A) it’s opinion and a call to action, I understand the call, but want to learn more about the whys.
B) Why resettle here instead of somewhere closer? Like Turkey and other surrounding countries. and
C) Why ARE refugee resettlements predominantly Muslim while persecuted Christians seem to get a hashtag at best?
And this.
Okay, first of all, what’s the difference betwixt the two? And second, I’m not seeing Radical Christianity, or Radical Buddhism, running amok in the world, perhaps there might be something else in the culture?
how about that the guy in CA was not a refugee? Seems that refugees are the wrong thing to be worried about
I didn’t think the article said he was a refugee and the screened wife coming in on a fiancé visa was neither technically a ‘refugee.’ Any other unfactualness in the article?