Beau Correll recently filed a lawsuit asking a federal court to allow him to not support Donald Trump for President at the Republican National Convention to be held in Cleveland from July 18-22.
Importantly, Mr. Correll recently held a TV interview saying that he will support a 3rd party candidate for President. That is a big problem for Mr. Correll because, as an elected Delegate from Virginia to the national convention, the rules of the Republican Party of Virginia state that he cannot support a candidate in opposition to a Republican nominee. The punishment for publicly stating non-support for the Republican candidate is removal from the party for four years. If he is immediately removed from the Republican party, then he must also be immediately removed as a Delegate from Virginia to the Republican National Convention.
This isn’t personal toward Beau. It’s about politics. And there is recent precedent for this behavior and punishment. In 2011, then-Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, and then-Lt. Governor Bill Bolling were both removed from the Republican party because of their public support for Bill Janis, who was running as an Independent against the Republican candidate for Commonwealth Attorney in Henrico County, VA.
This anti-Trump behavior is actually quite sickening. National figures such as Bill Kristol, George Will, and Henry Paulson (you remember him, don’t you – the King of Meltdown as the Secretary of the Treasury in 2008) are babbling about with their mutinous behavior and sandbox mentality of “he’s mean to people” and other such gibberish. They should all go and start their own Egghead Party.
In 2012, Mitt Romney wasn’t my first choice, nor was John McCain in 2008, nor Bob Dole in 1996. But I did the same thing during each of those fall election seasons – worked my butt off for each one of them – so that we wouldn’t be saddled with a leftist/socialist like we’ve had big time with Barack Obama.
So, now these anti-Trump people want to make headlines, since Donald Trump has sewn up the nomination, with active discussions of supporting a 3rd party candidate. And what will be the net effect of that? Of course, it will be Queen Hillary for 4 or 8 years in the White House.
Let’s do our part in Virginia to prevent that from happening by removing Beau Correll as a Delegate to Cleveland and put this mutiny to rest.
80 comments
Remove Correll. We do not want him representing the people. I am who natters. Correll can vote his conscience in November. We will not be ignored and our votes thrown out. The Delegates better vote as the people voted. I don’t give a fly about polls! I took Statistics, yes I have an college education, and you can try to prove whatever you want using statistics/polls. Until a poll covers every registered voters’ inputs, in the country, the polls really mean sqat.
M Myers
All Republicans who behave in a liberal manner, need to be removed as delegates.
These republicans on cnn are disgusting. They are a bunch of whiney brats. They dont need to be allowed on tv or in high positions. They are idiots. I hope Trump stomps the shit out of them and becomes the republican president with more votes than anyone in history. Hillary can never win we need to nip that in the bud ASAP
Turncoat Conservatives. RINO Elephant is the first thing that popped into my head when I saw this. This guy is spot on, there will be a price to pay.
I really wanted Cruz but he got Whipped and Whipped bad. My fellow Cruz need to join Hillarys Camp as many have done already. It doesn’t matter who beat Cruz, their Eggos allow them to only Sabatoge the GOP. Kick them out of GOP to the far left where their heart is already.
My Candidate was Cruz. I got over my hurt Ego and will support Trump.That’s exactly what the problem is, people not being mature and getting over their bad feelings.
In recent surveys of Free the Delegates, .01 of Republicans that are helping them are doing some because their guy didn’t win. That’s an absolutely minuscule number. However, the number of people opposed to Trump for moral and principled reasons is over 50% of the GOP.
Trump has been a dem all his life… well except when he was a registered republican. But he was a dem even then, right? Hell a lot of people have been dems all their life, until they switched to the gop. But what the hell do you know about growing the party? No, it’s loyalty oaths and other BS manipulation to trip up the voters for you. And when that doesn’t work, it’s time to change the rules to fit the desired results. Nixon had more morals than you people. People have been telling you for months to not play this hand, but of course THOSE PEOPLE are just ignorant bigots. You’ve told them that a million times already. Think they will now vote for your crony candidate? Fat Chance! Go ahead, kill the voter’s trust. You guys and the Sea Island gang will enjoy your pup tent party, because you won’t have to worry about getting anyone elected ever again..
Go ahead, nominate the fascist Trump and kill the GOP.
Funny, I don’t remember any of the Sea Island gang endorsing Trump. The Corporate United Kochhead fascists money is on those who will do their bidding. Trump didn’t attend their circle jerk.
Mr Staton what conservatives are you taking about? Sen Black understands clearly how important it is to get behind Donald Trump and has shown strong leadership on this issue of getting behind Donald Trump. A group of conservatives met with Donald Trump in New York and are now behind Donald Trump. At the Faith and Fredom coalition Trump won strong support from those folks.
Those conservatives that refuse to support Donald Trump are in the minority and are still hanging on by their fingernails to remain relvant. Those who are still screaming about Donald Trump are legends in their own minds and no one really cares what they think.
52% of the GOP is a minority? I don’t think so.
Yea, BS. A poll that came out today shoes Trump within 2% of HRC. But, we know bout’ them polls…..
Nope, this poll was from a few days ago. 52% of Republicans want a different nominee. Also, a poll today showed Trump lagging in every single swing state, some by double digits.
And you’re proving my point, more polls are coming out and even the best polls for Trump are showing him behind.
What poll? Link?
You go tell your 52% that Trump played by the rules and won fair and square, so says Speaker Ryan.
Here you go:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/donald-trump-republicans-polls-224853
If you like, I can link you to the breakdown of the poll from the groups that did the poll itself. All the hard data.
And? Trump is a crappy candidate who lacks basic human decency. “I won” was Obama’s rationale for being an annoying creep as well. Didn’t fly with him, won’t fly with Trump.
The convention and delegate systems were designed, in part, to weed out people like Trump. People with fanatical followings and little chance at winning the general election.
Yep.
How many times can you type that donkey’s name in one post?
In case you haven’t noticed, the majority of conservatives are not and were never behind the Drumpster-fire. He won the nom with Dixiecrats and other resent/current Dems. Conservatives do not get behind big-government liberals just because they switch parties.
Um. Is this the same Howie Lind who identified himself as “Virginia Chairman – Donald Trump For President” and tried to schedule a Donald Trump “event” in Sterling?
Why, yes! Yes it is! SouthsideCentral doesn’t forget these things.
Lind is just a self-promoting donkey looking to move up the ladder. He keeps running for office, but the people have been smart enough not to fall for his garbage yet.
Howie,
If you want to try and remove Mr. Correll, you will need to have someone file a challenge to his credentials at the Credentials Committee for the National Convention in Cleveland. If a majority of that committee agrees, and if the majority of the Convention Delegates vote in favor, then he will be removed as a delegate. At that point his spot will be filled by Blaine Dunn, who is the next highest vote winner in the 10th District, and is 1st alternate in the District as per the vote of the Virginia Delegation earlier in June.
My suggestion, however, is to stop the name calling and try to convince people like Beau as to why he should support Mr. Trump. Simply screaming, “WE HAVE TO BEAT HILLARY!!!” clearly isn’t doing it. If the Delegates in Cleveland vote to replace Trump with Ted Cruz, would you simply fall in line and support him because, “WE HAVE TO BEAT HILLARY!!!”? No. You know you wouldn’t.
Mr. Trump has been a Democrat all his life, and has shown clear indications since securing the nomination that he will not follow through on all the promises he made during the primary. If you want to beat Hillary, how about working towards getting Mr. Trump to win over the conservative voters that question his commitment to conservative principles, instead of trying to rev up the “Purge Machine.”
How about naming a national or statewide politician who did follow through on their promises?
I’ll tell you what Mr. Trump is. He is the nominee, so says almost 14 million voters.
You are the one, along with publicity seeker Correll, who seeks to defy the will of the voter.
He’s not the nominee until the delegates say so. Meanwhile, your guy is going to take our party down to defeat and cost us the House and Senate. Thanks for banging the final nail in America’s coffin.
He’s not my guy. She’s not my whatever either. I don’t have to make up my mind until November.
Now, your line of thinking is taking us down the road of dictatorship.
The people have spoken.
“The people have spoken.”
Yes, some of those people were Democrats, and some regret what they said. The majority oppose what those “14 million” supported. And the 14 million is about 10% of the total electorate for the general election (most of whom are offended by the lovely Mr. Trump).
Speaker Ryan said Trump played by the rules and won fair and square.
To even consider overthrowing the will of the people is stupid and beyond reason.
Yes, I agree, everyone played by the rules. And whether this decision is confirmed or changed at the convention will also be done by the rules. Losing this election to Hillary Clinton is stupid and beyond reason.
Yes, I will vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, but I think we are all well aware that he has a track record of saying things that meet the definition of “stupid and beyond reason” as well.
I really doubt that Trump or Hillary can screw up any worse than Bush 43′ did.
You can thank the Citizen United and SCOTUS decision for having 17 Republican candidates.
Reap what you sow.
Actually, you can thank the First Amendment for the SCOTUS decision on Citizens United.
As far as Bush 43 is concerned, he achieved greater economic growth than Obama has. While he had a Republican Congress, the country had strong economic growth and declining deficits (even with the wars going on). Oh, yeah, and he actually believed in defeating terrorists. I have no doubt that Hillary can screw things up worse than almost anyone. With Trump, it depends which version we get.
Well, then live by the results of the CU decision. 17 candidates, with Trump the winner. Reap what you sow.
Want to talk about GDP? What was it during the Clinton years?
Want to talk about defeating terrorism? Who got Bin Ladin?
Yes, I guess freedom should lot be permitted to mere citizens! Sometimes it is a bit messy that way. Remember, Democrats also were operating under the same rules about which they were complaining so much.
GDP? Yes, we got better growth under Bush (esp. under a Republican Congress) than under Obama. As for Clinton, he got great GDP growth when he got a Republican Congress and cut capital gains taxes. The economy was rather stagnant in Clinton’s first two years.
As far as Bin Laden, goes, the enhanced interrogation methods used under Bush paved the way to capture Bin Laden. Do you think we could even have gotten close to getting Bin Laden under Al Gore? Besides Bin Laden, we did nail a lot of other al-Qaeda leaders under Bush. The fact that you are changing the subject shows the lack of merit in your arguments or knowledge of ancient history.
Oh – so you are a Democrat. Now it all makes sense, especially why you want Trump to be the nominee.
Better than ’43????? Unbelievable statement. You must not be a Republican.
Emperors are overthrown. Candidates are nominated or they are not nominated. The assignment of ownership of the nomination to Donald Trump is premature, and the use of the word “overthrow” suggests some moral authority or divine right has been conferred upon him. He holds no such authority.
Go ahead, change the rules, it would be hilarious.
Who do you think that the Republican Party could nominate in July at the convention, who has the money, organizations in 50 states, everything in place at such a late date?
All great questions. From what I understand, even Trump hasn’t set up those organizations.
I see us avoiding the hardest question, in a manner that caused DoD to throw good money after bad towards doomed acquisitions programs. Until one day, somebody had to ask the question for all to consider.
The hardest, and most important question each voter must confront is: how far must Trump sink before even (fIill in your name here) sees him as unacceptable?
If every one of us hasn’t or won’t answer that question, we are without standards and are lost.
“The hardest, and most important question each voter must confront is: how far must Trump sink before even (fIill in your name here) sees him as unacceptable?”
That question has been answered in the voting booth at primary, by about 14 million voters. Not to be changed by a couple thousand delegates.
And then, come November? If you don’t like Trump, don’t vote for him.
You didn’t answer my question about who? And remember, the Trump voters will not support anybody else, so the new guy loses millions right off the bat. The 10 million people who would lose health care will not vote Republican. Blacks, Hispanics, women, gays, all in the Democrats corner.
I just don’t see a Republican path to the WH?
Yes. That many Republicans and Democrats indeed voted for Trump in the primary. Not enough to get him elected by a long stretch. And since those primaries, he has walked back just about every policy position that he originally held. He has migrated toward liberal positions in every case, and his boorish behavior hasn’t ceased. Chances of his election — nomination or not — are diminishing by the day.
The GOP candidate is unlikely to win the presidential race at this point. At this point, which course of action costs the GOP less:
*If we go with Trump, we will keep the far right but lose many people who are principled and less inclined towards “burn it down” politics, lose the White House and several seats in the Senate and House.
*If we dump Trump, we will lose the far right, lose the White House, but keep more seats in the Senate and House.
Tye GOP’s only choice would be to nominate one of the candidates whose campaigns have been “suspended.”
Establishment BS. You are afraid in spite of all the odds, that some how, Trump just might do the impossible and win. And just maybe Hillary gets indicted.
More establishment scare tactics. Where do you come up with your BS?
You know, it took about 20 years of Bush 43′, hate radio with the EVIL network, and screw the middle-class politics to nominate Trump. It didn’t happen in 6 months.
Bush 43′ inherited a balanced annual budget. Look what he left 8 years later? Not to mention a terrorist attack that left 3000 dead on his watch. Where do you think the explosives came from that all these terrorists are using for their attacks in Europe and the middle-east? Bush’43 screwed up the balance of evil in the middle-east so it can never be repaired.
And people like you? You just keep begging for more.
You fail to address the fact that if Trump wins, he appears unlikely to advocate for any conservative issues, and may ultimately provide results that will be as destructive as a Clinton presidency, only it will be our doing.
I see the increasing stare of what was a news cycle and the increasing cost of campaigns as two growing incentives. Incentives that diminish accountability and drive legislators to duplicitous behaviors.
We probably agree on those. Where do we not concur? I’m objective enough to see that Trump isn’t a break in that trend — he’s the Next Step in the evolution of opportunism, reality-tv politics, and deception.
The way I see it, I have the courage to look at the GOP’s coming loss, regardless of who is nominated. I have the honesty to see that voters like you and (yes) me failed to stop this dynamic in its tracks. I have the clarity to understand that conservatism is going to take a short term hit, and must play long ball instead.
The cowards here are the ones without the spine to hold themselves accountable. The cowards look for easy targets to whom they pass blame. The cowards quickly make personal attacks, rather than stop to consider the merits of what others say. The cowards hope against hope that Donald Trump will turn out to be something other than who they know he is.
It’s not about what you or I think Trump is or will be. He played by the rules, won fair and square. It’s about the will of the people.
Do you think Ed Gillespie, or any other establishment GOP candidate, will get the votes of Trump supporters if the delegates pull a fast on at the convention? The GOP can kiss Virginia goodbye if they do somthing funny at the convention. I suspect it is that way in other states.
It won’t be Ed if they nominate someone else. Your ‘establishment’ argument is a strawman.
No. If Trump is not nominated, I believe the far right will either not vote or they will vote for independents. But association with Trump will cost those same candidates the votes of many moderates, and there are more moderates than far-right conservatives.
Damage is likely either way.
It will be the gop doing because they gave everything to Obama, and would no doubt do the same for Trump or Clinton. Until Congress stands up for itself it won’t matter who is president/emperor.
You’re a liberal Democrat and we’re supposed to take advice from you?
Nope. But you’re much worse than a Democrat aren’t you? You are the ESTABLISHMENT!
Those lost ‘far right’ voters who voted for Trump were also the ‘far right’ voters who helped put Jim Webb in the Senate. Now the party’s antics are fixing to turn a whole bunch of gerrymandered gop districts blue. Not just in Virginia but across the nation. This isn’t about Trump, it’s about not listening to the citizens the party is not representing. Gerrymandering doesn’t work when YOUR VOTERS stay home.
If by ‘far right’ you mean constitutional conservatives, Trump has none of those folks. He’s got a bunch of angry Americans who made the mistake of believing him on immigration and are now very very quiet as the gnawing feeling grows that the Cruz folks might actually have been correct about their guy. He also has socialists and people who once considered themselves conservatives but abandoned their principles in favor of the myth of ‘electability.’
“Far right” was my reach at a polite term for those willing to embrace extreme policies, excessive behavior, racism, and xenophobia.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/03/who-are-donald-trumps-supporters-really/471714/
Also this http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0ZE2SW
We will write in Trump’s name on our November ballots. We will not vote for an alternate that you want. This is why we the people are going to get rid of you in our GOP. Yes it is ours not yours because we are the vote!
We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender…”
The Churchill parody was great, but it’s about what the majority of Republicans want, not what the loudest Republicans want. And a majority of Republicans are not Trump fans.
You’re right, there is no Republican path to the WH with Trump because he’s not a Republican, he’s a pretender.
I notice you speak of those “who would lose health care.” Sounds like you want Trump’s single payer plan. Or HIllary’s.
Great question. Reinhardt can’t answer that though because he’s a Democrat.
You people got a lot of nerve to claim to be Republicans, and yet, all you ever do is attack the Republcan Party nominee. You should be kicked out the party. And you call Trump a liar? Better look in a mirror.
Mick Staton addressed this viewpoint very succinctly in his comment at the top of the page.
There is nothing in the Republican codes that requires perfect lock-step loyalty to a candidate. The reason for that being we’re not Democrats, we don’t demand our voters sacrifice their principles for a candidate if they find him to be immoral or untrustworthy. Based on multiple sources, over 50% Republicans think Trump is awful. That means the Trump supporters are the minority of the Republican party, not us.
“You people got a lot of nerve to claim to be Republicans, and yet, all
you ever do is attack the Republcan Party nominee. You should be kicked
out the party. And you call Trump a liar? Better look in a mirror.”
Ummm, RRIII, you attacked the last Republican PRESIDENT! I would say you should be kicked out of the party, but I suspect you were never in it. As far as liars go, given how often you get refuted, you are the one who ought to be looking in a mirror.
As far as Trump himself goes, has he pretty much abandoned at this point everything he set himself up to be? Let’s see . . .
1) Rich guy who will self-fund — GONE
2) Deport illegals — only to let them back in (but he likely won’t kick them out anyway)
3) Tax cut — Looks great, and then he wants to add complicated taxes only on those “hedge fund managers.”
4) Health care reform — and then he thinks single payer is a good idea
5) Pro-life — Can’t articulate, because he never was.
6) Fighting terrorism — But “Bush lied.” No post-ISIS plan.
7) Rebooted campaign — What, he will need Paul Manafort to provide adult supervision during his entire term(s)?
8) Outsider — Who needs a political insider like Paul Manafort. (Nothing against Manafort, who talks like an adult, but it does point out the hypocrisy).
9) Win in a landslide — Rarely breaks 40% in any poll.
10) Fault of the “Establishment” — No, he offends real conservatives.
Look, this year is so crazy that anything can happen, but let’s face it, Trump shows all the hallmarks of a con man. Sure, he got 14 million or so votes, but even getting beyond how many might have been Democrats, it shows that he was presenting a deceptive image to the well-meaning Republicans who did vote for him. Even with all his baggage, I still consider Trump less bad than Hillary, but I count myself among the majority of Republicans who would like a replacement candidate.
You’re right. That troll is just spewing Trump propaganda to ensure the only person GUARANTEED to lose to Hillary is nominated…
There is at least one person who does – or, his volunteer army would take it upon themselves to support another candidate. Almost anybody but Trump.
He didn’t win fair and square. Fox News gave him North-Korea-level propaganda nearly 24/7. Either they think when he loses to Hillary they’ll get higher ratings (they do better when there’s more to complian about), or they know Trump won’t follow through on immigration (Murdoch is a big open borders guy). OR, Trump has something on Roger Ailes. FOX allowed all the Trump lies to go unchallenged and never gave his opponents a break or even much time. $2 BILLION in free advertising. Trump’s surrogates also threatened those who opposed him as well as delegates. And they planted vile, false stories about Ted Cruz and his family in the media.
Trump was allowed to constantly flaunt the rules and play dirty. Seems the RNC has zero standards for decency of its candidates. Trump really could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it.
Plus, he was awarded a majority of delegates for only 40% of the votes.
It’s been reported that at least half of that $14 MIllion were Democrats choosing Hillary’s opponent for her – the only one she can beat.
Studies say up to 12 Million of them were Democrats. I think that’s a high estimate but it was a significant fraction.
The convention is a second chance after time has elapsed and new information has been learned. A chance to undo buyers’ remorse. I suppose Trump supporters Do want Hillary to be president, which is not entirely surprising all things considered.
Or, you can be a populist and support the dictatorship of mob rule. We are a representative republic. The delegates are there not to have a big party but to deliberate and make the choice of nominee. Those are the actual rules and they have been for the history of the party, except once in 1976.
If you want a dictator, all you have to do is look at Trump with his quashing of all dissent and his threatening delegates and other dissenters. He’s every bit the egomaniacal narcissist that Obama is and he holds many of the same positions as Hillary, if anyone bothered to look.
And, there are rules for the delegates to follow.
Yes, and there is ample evidence that they are either already unbound, or they have the right to unbind themselves.
You have a bitch that can do whatever she wants and get away with it. She could kill someone and get away with it. Plus they say anyone could have and probably did get in here emails so now she can be black mailed by russia or anyone. She absolutely cannot be president and is disqualified.
Rick you have not been right yet about Trump. There is no evidence to back up your claim that Trump will cost us the House and Senate.
Because it ain’t true. The Republicans mite cause themselves the Senate. Then look to play the blame game.
It’s scare tactics.
Two interesting pieces. Not chock full of empirical data, but not easily refuted:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/trump-gop-house-majority-jeopardy-221004
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/senate-gop-trump-224027
We can count on legislators to act in their own interests. They are backing away from Trump. It stands to reason that they feel his presence on the ticket is a threat to their reelections.
Taking data from the anti trump site politico is akin to taking data from the Wash Post/ABC/MSNBC.
I was at the Faith and Freedom Coaliion event I saw the support Trump received from conservatives.
Taking data only from pro-Trump sites is myopic. We must as individuals read all sources and evaluate each article and survey on its own merits. Those articles are pretty well-written. They contain none of the inflammatory headlines that are hallmarks of yellow journalism.
Trump does not receive support from conservatives.
The only campaigns that will be hurt are the ones running away from The Donald. Considering how much credence you put in polls taken in June, how do you like these apples?
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch
Interesting also. Good links to methodology. The editorial went a bit further than the survey responses.
Only sloppy part is the way they derive respondent demographic from the proportion of voters in the state. Also it was an automated survey. Don’t know about you, but I routinely hang up on automated calls. I’d be interested to learn more about what demographic.
Thanks for sharing.
You are so very welcome. Enlightening the clueless always a joy!
Ted Cruz kept his promises. But people wanted the shiny lying object instead – Orange Koresh.
Teddy was nothing but a puppet for Goldman Sachs.
OK: Ted Cruz. That’s about the only one who comes to mind off the bat.
The RNC convention rules allow for voting your conscience. There is a lot of evidence that the delegates are unbound. That’s the reason they are called delegates. They weren’t elected to go have a big party. They were elected to deliberate. The rules have always been clear that the convention delegates themselves choose the nominee. Just as the founders were free to vote their own conscience in the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention.
http://www.delegatesunbound.com/
I never thought the GOP would be so anti-freedom and anti-conscience. Trump is turning it into a bunch of fascists. He’s just as dictatorial as Obama. Of course some don’t care as long as he’s THEIR dictator.
Why are Trump and his campaign so afraid? If actual Republicans really wanted him he should be able to walk away with it on the first ballot even if they vote their conscience.
Because they know if delegates vote their conscience they will not choose him because he is a vile, crooked, lying, liberal Democrat fraud who doesn’t even support the GOP platform. He is even now reneging on all his campaign promises. He’s not going to deport or build a wall. He’s not going to appoint pro-life Constitutionalist justices. He’s not going to promote religious liberty, he’s already said he will promote the radical gay agenda. He’s not going to stop muslim terrorists coming from Europe. He wants to take away your right to bear arms without due process and agrees with Hillary on this. We should not be surprised. This has been his politics his whole life. There’s a reason Bill Clinton encouraged him to run 3 weeks before he announced.
At last check 52% of Republicans want the party to choose another nominee.
And – Trump seems to not even try to campaign. He says he’s going to wait till after the convention??? WHAT? And he’s hardly raised any money (wasn’t he ‘self-funding’?). He’s hired hardly any staff and is actually closing offices in some states. HIs ‘self-funding’ has turned out to just be a loan that the RNC has to pay him back. One-fifth of his campaign spending has been paid to his own Trump businesses. He’s even taking a salary himself! More evidence that he’s trying to LOSE this election for his good friend Hillary and is scamming for his own profit as well.
The scary thing is, as Trump walks back all his positions, his supporters abandon their principles. Now the Constitution and conservatism are no longer important – it’s “nationalism”, which means an all-powerful state that tolerates no dissent.
You haven’t heard the beginning of the corruption of Hillary’s donor Trump. The media has not unleashed all they know about him and won’t unless they are sure he’s the nominee. And they won’t have to make anything up. The country already gives him a 70% disapproval rating because he is a crazy, stupid, lying bully. He’s already down 6-12 points. It’s over.
If you hate the constitution, then go ahead and oppose brave patriots like Beau Correll.
And with Trump as the nominee, get ready to say President Hillary Clinton.
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace…Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
“If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.”
-Sam Adams
History long hence will not be kind to those who fell for the Trump cult-of-personality scam and threw away their last chance for restoring freedom for decades.
Corporate United is not freedom. Sea Island gamesmanship is not freedom. The crap the RPV and others have played the past few years is definitely not freedom. The party wanted a primary over a party convention. Now that the results don’t meet their expectations they want to rig the jury. Tough sh!t. Maybe next time you will try building a citizen’s party instead of a gob club.
I don’t care who the delegates want to vote for because my vote and millions of other registered voters trump the delegates wishes. You will not tell us what we want because we have a brain and we have decided with our votes. Be careful, we will turn our backs on your futures as politicians. We will vote all of you out of Congress and the House. The delegates can vote their conscience in the November polls.
Fed up with the delegates,
M Myers
Registered Voter