Rubio Mocks Hillary’s Kickoff
written by Jeanine Martin
June 14, 2015
10 comments
Jeanine Martin
Also known as Lovettsville Lady, I am a Republican activist in the wilds of western Loudoun County.
10 comments
Hillary is almost un-electable.
A closer look at Rubio’s resume says ‘Bush Gay Lite.’
Surely the Party of Lincoln can do better.
So far, I’ll take the pro-life, anti-bailout Dem–Martin O’Malley
Nary a new idea from Nillary.
Love the juxtaposition. Not my first choice, but he’d get my support as the nominee.
I read you, RR3, however, we have only two parties. Rubio, who is not my preferred nominee, will likely give me 80% of what I want, as opposed to Hillary or Bernie, who will give me 8% of what I want. I don’t know about you, but 80% is a whole lot better than 8%.
Agree Mark! I would support a Walker/Rubio ticket or vice versa.
I understand. Just who is your preferred nominee?
By the way, Rand voted no to the fast track trade legislation.
I like Rand Paul the best. But all the GOP candidates will all give me at least 60% of what I want. I tend to wander off the conservative reservation on about five issues (living wage for ADULTs, global warming, progressive tax rate, gay marriage, tax on high sugar foods and drinks, etc), so I am can even live with Governor Christie.
Why don’t we mock Marco Rubio for his YES vote in the U.S. Senate on the fast track trade bill legislation (HR 1314)? Yes, Rubio and Cruz both trust president Obama to negotiate trade bills.
I would not vote for Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz now for “dog catcher”. They want to sell out America with bad trade bills.
Why shouldn’t Rubio and Cruz be held to the same standards as you hold Virginia’s U.S. Congressmen?
If you understand the bill, please explain it to the rest of us, so that we can be equally outraged, and avoid a dogcatcher named Rubio or Cruz.
A fresh start for America … and for the national Republican party.