The Bull Elephant
  • Home
  • About The Bull Elephant
  • Fun Stuff
  • Contact The Bull Elephant
Latest Posts
Proposed Convention Amendments
Cancel Culture as America’s New Religion
A letter in Response to SCC Vice Chair...
Right From The Start: Will Democrats Re-Elect President...
The McDuff Debacle
A new convention plan
Sunday Memes–Let’s all try to be less white

The Bull Elephant

  • Home
  • About The Bull Elephant
  • Fun Stuff
  • Contact The Bull Elephant

The Supreme Court to Decide if Names Like The Redskins can be Trademarked

written by Jeanine Martin September 29, 2016

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that maintains not allowing names that some find offensive, like The Slants and The Washington Redskins, violates the 1st amendment, the right to free speech.

The high Court did not take up the Redskins case but chose a lawsuit by an Oregon band known as The Slants because it was further along in the legal process.  When the leader of the band, Simon Tam, attempted to register their name back in 2011, with the Patent and Trademark Office, he was refused. The Supremes’ ruling on that case will effect the Redskins and their ability to regain the trademark of their name.  From the Washington Post: 

The patent office said the name was likely to disparage a significant number of Asian Americans. But Tam said the point of the band’s name is just the opposite: an attempt to reclaim a slur and use it “as a badge of pride.”

 

“Simon Tam is not a bigot; he is fighting bigotry with the time-honored technique of seizing the bigots’ own language,” Tam’s lawyer, John C. Connell, wrote. “Only an uninformed philistine could find the band’s name disparaging.”

At issue is the 1946 Lanham Act that prohibits the trademark registration of any name that ‘may disparage’ people. That is being challenged as a violation of free speech. It’s also being challenged because the law is vague and opaque with the government’s rulings being capricious. The government gets to decide which names are ok and which aren’t.  From the Washington Post:

The PTO (Patent and Trademark Office) denied registration to Have You Heard Satan is a Republican “because it disparaged the Republican Party,” the band’s lawyers wrote, but it did not find the Devil Is a Democrat “disparaging.”

The Slants case was chosen because they further along in their lawsuit than the Redskins.  The Redskins are waiting an appeal to the 4th circuit after a district judge refused to overturn the PTO’s ruling in 2014 removing the trademark of the team’s 84 year old name.

The Supreme Court will hear The Slants’ case during the coming session which begins on Monday.

More on the story here and here. 

 

 

The Supreme Court to Decide if Names Like The Redskins can be Trademarked was last modified: September 29th, 2016 by Jeanine Martin
The RedskinsThe SlantsThe Supreme Court
3 comments
Jeanine Martin

Also known as Lovettsville Lady, I am a Republican activist in the wilds of western Loudoun County.

Your life will be better if you click one of these

Proposed Convention Amendments

March 2, 2021

Cancel Culture as America’s New Religion

March 1, 2021

A letter in Response to SCC Vice...

March 1, 2021

Right From The Start: Will Democrats Re-Elect...

February 28, 2021

The McDuff Debacle

February 28, 2021

A new convention plan

February 28, 2021

Sunday Memes–Let’s all try to be less...

February 28, 2021

Shaun Kenney is Correct

February 27, 2021

Letter from RPV Chairman regarding convention at...

February 27, 2021

Tilting at Windmills

February 26, 2021

Fun Stuff

  • Sunday Memes–Let’s all try to be less white

  • Sunday Funday Memes!

  • Sunday Memes–We deserve a laugh today

  • Best Super Bowl commercials 2021

  • Sunday Memes, Circleback!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Sign Up for Email Alerts

[wysija_form id="5"]

Advertisement

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

@2017 Bull Elephant Media LLC.


Back To Top