Delegate Nick Freitas on the 2nd Amendment and lack of respect from Democrats in the House of Delegates

Excellent!

However, we need go further back to 1789 and the adoption of the Second Amendment, which was part and parcel of the the 18th-century founding fathers replacement of Yahweh’s moral law and Biblical principles for their own capricious man-made traditions. From this was created the rights culture by which non-optional Biblical responsibilities were replaced with optional Enlightenment rights:

“[B]ecause they have … trespassed against my law … they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind….” (Hosea 8:1, 7)

Today’s America is reaping the inevitable whirlwind (including everything that’s enumerated in the video above) resulting from the wind sown by the constitutional framers.

“Thus says Yahweh, “Stand by the ways and see and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is, and walk in it; and you shall find rest for your souls….” (Jeremiah 6:16)

America needs to return to what pre-Second Amendment Americans looked to as their authority to bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, and others: the Biblical non-optional responsibility vs. the the Second Amendment’s Enlightenment optional right to do so.

If every Christian man were armed and ready to take out the Cruzs (and protected by government for doing so), it would all but eliminate mass murderers, and most other murderers as well.

America was sold down the river when the 18th-century Enlightenment and Masonic founding fathers replaced Biblical responsibilities with Enlightenment rights, and nothing demonstrates it better than the Second Amendment.

Think about it: The Amendment WITH the wording “shall not be infringed” is the MOST infringed, licensed, and limited Amendment of the entire twenty seven. Furthermore, a future generation of our posterity is likely to see the Second Amendment whittled away entirely or repealed altogether. This is inherent nature and danger of optional Enlightenment rights versus non-optional Biblical responsibilities, such as the following:

“Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a twoedged sword [or today’s equivalent] in their hand … this honour have all his saints. Praise ye Yah.” (Psalm 149:6-9)

“But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house [including spiritual and physical protection], he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” (1 Timothy 5:8)

Which is more potent: 1) an optional right, or 2) a non-optional responsibility.

Which is more likely to be legislated, licensed, and limited?

Which did the pre-Second Amendment Americans look to as their authority for bearing arms?

For more, listen to “The Second Amendment: A Knife in a Gunfight,” delivered at the Springfield, Missouri Firearms and Freedom Symposium, at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.com/#FeaturedMessages.

At this same location, you will also find a radio interview Larry Pratt (Executive Director of Gun Owners of America) conducted with me on this same subject. I think you’ll find Mr. Pratt’s remarks especially interesting.

Then find out how much you *really* know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a complimentary copy of a book that examines the Constitution by the Bible.

Democratic delegates are all up in arms and outrageously outraged today about the “dog whistles” involved in telling them the truth.

Go Nick!

Huh, and I thought I was good at emptying out a room…

Do not think that Freetas is the right candidate to run against Kaine.
.
However he just might be the perfect candidate to run against “old man” Warner.