In shopping at my local grocery, I am usually just focused on things like eggs, bread, milk, butter and cold cuts. But for some reason, today was different, and here is some of what I discovered:
The magazine rack is filled with women’s magazines. Cosmopolitan was featured and the lead story was “The Sex Secrets for Easy Os!!!!”. At the bottom was “Sex Toys: We Tried them all”. Another women’s magazine featured a Kardashian touting her sex life. The final magazine before I moved on discussed a lot of divorce and sexual intrigue. Nowhere did I see a men’s magazine, not even one in a brown wrapper.
I happened to need men’s deodorant so I marched down the appropriate aisle. Imagine my surprise when I reached the KY Jelly section. My goodness, the old days are truly gone. There were at least as many interesting and tasty things for women as there were for men. I moved on quickly because some women were beginning to look at me in a rather strange way.
As I rounded the corner heading for the eggs, I spotted the book section, 90% of which were romance novels. I opened a few pages and I can tell you these are not the romance novels from the 60s. The sex was graphic and laid out in great detail. I noted that most of the book covers showed a woman being ravished by some hunk of a guy.
Now I don’t know what it was doing there, but one of the magazines located near the romance novels had fallen on the floor. It happened to open to an advertisement for virtually every kind of female enhancement. There was a lift for everything from the bottom to the breasts to the face and even some things in between which I will not mention.
Ladies and gentlemen. I have discovered the women’s locker room and it is roughly at aisle 13.
I’m pretty sure you went down Aisle 13 more than once “just to make sure you read everything correctly”.
And you should have went to Wegman’s. Susan Stimpson would have been glad to talk to you about her religious beliefs to set you straight.
And I always thought it was the beauty parlor.
Is the author asserting that women are sex obsessed and therefore deserving of sexual assault by Donald Trump???
No, I think he’s saying women are lewd and sexualized and will grab men by the crotch when they can get away with it.
I think he meant rape by Bill Clinton. ?
Interesting how Republicans can boil over Democrats’ opposition to impeachment of Clinton for having a consentual extramarital affair (as were the Republicans who led the impeachment), and seek retribution by condoning sexual assault by one of their own.
Yes, two wrongs make a right. I’ll pass that on to my daughters, you pervert.
Why is it always about the sex and you bring kids into it? And then you accuse others of perversion? You really should just ignore this stuff because clearly it upsets you.
Truth often comes in unusual packages. It is obvious this struck a nerve, one that is far too close to the truth about the women he claims to advocate for.
I dare you to approach one sexual assault victim with your smug ,stupid, inexcusable standpoint.
What are you going to do, hug them? Me, I will try to find the bastard and bring justice to him. Emotional drivel solves nothing but that seems to be your replacement for action.
Sorry, Juanita B., you got raped but there is nothing we can do because Bill and Hillary are above the law! But take comfort because we will condemn Trump for his potty mouth. We really are tough, aren’t we? Well, aren’t we?
Why aren’t WE condemning both of them?
You want to abandon Trump for locker room talk by equating it to the actions of both Clinton’s. By the way, when you find the perfect man or woman, let us all know. Last time I checked, there weren’t any and all are sinners redeemed by the grace and mercy of a Christian God.
Telling people you committed sexual assault is not locker room talk. Wrong is wrong, whether a Trump does it or a Clinton does it. I will condone neither.
Last time I checked, God offers grace in mercy, but the sinner has to want it, and that covers eternal punishment, not temporal punishment. That’s why rapists can be forgiven yet deservedly sentenced to jail.
You do realize that Bill Clinton never apologized.
I really don’t care about apologies. Such conduct is abdisqualifier. Had I been a Clinton supporter, my knowledge of such conduct would have led me ton withdraw my support and object to my party’s support of anybody who was not qualified to lead.
I apply the same standard here.
You do realize Trump was joking around, right?! It was just baudy banter – locker room talk, in private, between two guys.
IF Trump has EVER laid a finger on any woman against her will, that would have made front page news on EVERY media outlet FOR WEEKS! The media has been combing through Trump’s life with a fine-tooth comb for a year and got NOTHING. Nada.
Surely you realize that. Unless you’re a liberal who’s out of touch with reality; they actually think talk = action. Hence their “hate speech” concept.
Trump never raped or sexually assaulted a single woman; whereas Bill raped & assaulted MANY women.
Those are FACTS.
A very good point about hate speech. Equating speech to action will eventually be followed by equating private thought with action.
That is one of the fundamental problems with the left. If they don’t like what you say, you must be hateful. Watching the SJW assault others is, to them, less wrong than a satire like this article.
FACT: “I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. I just kiss. I don’t even wait.” — Donald Trump
FACT: Sexual assault: any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient.” — DOJ
You mean the Obama DOJ? Now that is a good one. Justice is conditional upon political party. Honest Abe they ain’t.
Would you prefer Virginia definitions for sexual assault and sexual battery?
Funny! I think he is a New Yorker.
You obviously don’t have the responsibility of raising daughters, and don’t know any women who have been sexually assaulted, or you do but you are oblivious. Or perhaps your use of a screen name gives you a sense of freedom to feel unbound by moral and ethical standads that are square one stuff for adults. So which is it — are you ignorant, immature, or both?
Yep! Struck a nerve.
This is exactly what I mean… let it go.
Not going to do that. Every time you or some other morally-compromised troll advocates for sexual assault, or toleration of those who commit it, I plan to call it out as wrong. It is unacceptable. And every time you disagree while claiming to represent the voice of GOP activists, you willingly associate the GOP at large with what we all know to be wrong.
This is where I live, and where my children will live.
I have a better idea. You give it up.
I will pray for you and your children.
I agree. For someone to be this obsessed there is a great deal of hurt involved. I will pray for him to find peace.
Go one better. Disassociate yourself and your double standards from the GOP.
None are better than He!
He cannot give it up because it is his basis for abandoning Trump. He claims the high ground but, in truth, accepts the lowest of all possible choices – the Clintons. I wish our nominee were someone else, particularly Ted Cruz, but that is not the case.
How nice it is to have moral indignation that ignores reality. I too like such a position, but reality is a far different thing.
It is apparent that you are apoplectic about satire. And do pass it on to your daughters, maybe they have a sense of humor. By the way, speaking of perverts, the party you support is run by them.
The Clinton impeachment was about much more than consensual sex – perjury was involved.
Finally, while we are at, my guess is you think that all those women who claim Clinton raped and molested them are, to quote Joy Behar, tramps.
Satire for what purpose? Locker room talk? Trivializing sexual assault to rationalize a totally unsatisfactory candidate? Again, the double standards — point at what you despise in Democrats to embrace the same conduct in the GOP. Nice.
Trump talked. Clinton did.
Satire has many purposes. I suggest you look up the definition and then figure it out. I did and this article is hilarious.
In case you missed the memo, sexual assault is wrong, you idiot. Why on earth would anybody condone Bill Clinton’Clinton’s conduct? You persist in a juvenile association that Bill Clinton’s conduct sets the minimum acceptable standard for what should pass in the GOP. That is moronic
There is a Muslim sexual assault and rape epidemic throughout Europe, particularly Sweden. And how do the governments respond? They blame the victim, hide the truth and prosecute anyone who points out what is happening. Yet here you are with indignation and make out Trump to be the devil himself. I find your comments to be self-serving nonsense.
Oh good, so as long as we are more moral than ISIS, we are okay then! That”s a relief.
Again you swing and miss. It is the governments of Europe that accept the sexual assaults and rape by Muslims. Frankly, ISIS is more moral in their way than Europe is at this point. European governments, run by the likes of Clinton and Obama, are destroying western civilization in then vain hope that a utopian new world order will arise. They are fools.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with condoning sexual assault.
Really? Have you not read about the behavior of governments in the USA. Sexual assault is constantly condoned in the name of sanctuary, multiculturalism, and more.
I certainly do not condone sexual assault, but unlike you, I know that reality has to be dealt with. The salty language of the seaman, the construction worker, the military grunt, etc is part of life as is the gold diggers, trophy wives, and prostitutes.
I pray for a better, more moral America. Democrats do not.
It’s not just salty talk when you say you’ve done it, and Trump said he did it. As to the education on what those fabled profession’s accept as “salty language,” I’ve worked in construction and the military, and never heard claims of sexual assault tolerated in either. In theblatter, I had a Marine sent to court martial for sexual assault. So peddle those falsehoods elsewhere.
Ever hear of the happy birthday —— ? Bet you know what it is.
Must be a pervert troll thing.
That is why I thought you would know it. You claimed to prosecute a Marine.
“European governments, run by the likes of Clinton and Obama”
so much for free will, sovereignty, and globalism – the big bad obama rules the world, and since he is not a real american christian, this must be true
Globalism is socialism. Free will is never part of the socialist equation and national sovereignty disappears under the new world order.
As far as Obama, actions speak louder than words, and at this point with but a few months left what he is makes little difference.
Ha! Nice try! The old trick of trying to mix apples and pears and trying to get egg nog!
So given that Trump has stated he’s repeatedly done what constitutes sexual assault, and satire is supposed to criticize something, it seems that something is the gravity associated with what Trump has claimed to have done. So since the claims came voluntarily from the mouth of the 59 year old man himself, our approval of this as funny signals our approval of what he did. Republicans approve of sexual assault. How’s that for a slippery slope?
What am I? The Trump Public Defender? In someone else’s cooked up narrative? The Grand Inquisitor in the Parade of Pietists? In someone else’s event?
Mike, I don’t think people really care much what I think, especially when the Corey Stewart interview is now the Big Deal story. It’s all over the Internet!.
I’m not a Stewart fan, but was immediately struck by the Trump campaign’s speed in canning him. Trump appears to depend heavily on RNC money, which suggests he’s going to follow the money if he is elected.
I don’t expect you or any conservative to be Trump’s public defender, but as a father of five daughters and somebody whose extended family includes victims of sexual assault, I find the current rationalizations of Trump’s claims to be disturbing.
Listen for yourself, and consider how to tell your kids about how Trump became the GOP’s champion (for non-parents, kids are outstanding listeners, but let you know when you betray them with b.s.)
Teach, if you wish, your daughters that there is evil in the world, and that they should guard against it. Teach them how not to be played for fools by evil people faining goodness, but who unscrupulously conspire day and nigh for their own gain.
While you are at, you might remember who raped and assaulted these women so picture. And if you listen to the video, pay some heed to what Paul Jones has to say at very the end. You might also take care in the way you toss your words about, ‘sexual assault’ for one.
I wasn’t tossing it around at all. One lesson I’ve taught alreday — this who are silent when wrong is done are themselves complicit. This isn’t about either Clinton. It is about local enthusiastic endorsement of Donald Trump, regardless of what wrong he is revealed to have done.
All I can say at this point is: God deliver me from geniuses who reckon in nanometers. And that’s about the length of three gold atoms line up end to end, meaning I can hardly see any common sense in anything you have said.
You seem to be a good guy, and you seem to have love for your daughters … and I respect that. But when it comes to forest and trees, and not knowing the difference, I give up.
Then each of us feels the other is missing a fundamental, obvious fact. Or several. But my sincere thanks for the tone and substance of your comments. You’ve elevated the conversation.
In today’s America, I think is quite common for people to ‘talk past’ one another. I think the reasons for this are several.
For one, the American people have been deliberately fractured into various antagonistic factions. Such a people, always put into play by their handler rulers, will not easily unite by their true best self-interest. Amazingly, Trump has managed to short circuit some of the usual tricks. And it scares the hell out of the elites. The Play Book of Perpetual Division just seems to not be working the way it should in this particular campaign season.
In particular, our educations have been so truncated that it is an amazement that anyone can think their way out of a wet paper bag. And yet a certain number of people do always do. Somehow, the miracle of life is that there are always some among us who see past the smoke, the fog, the machinery of obfuscation. Hence, in the last century, a Pound, an Eliot, a Solzhenitsyn, and so forth. And in our present time, a Snowden, an Assange, a Richard Gates. Maybe not a definitive list for the present era, but time will round that out to greater exactitude.
My only observation is that the 18th century American educated class was pretty much on the same page, at least in that which was most fundamental, most compelling of life. Not so in our time. Our system of mis-education has done us a profound disservice in cheating us out of the self-possession of our minds, depriving us of our proper steerage. This, as my inquiry into the past so instructs me, is by design.
Thanks for your latest, a bright spot in my day.