Tell Me Lies, Tell Me Sweet Little Lies.
On the eve of the 2008 Presidential election then Senator Barak Obama still claimed that he believed that a marriage was a union between a man a woman, at least that was his most recent stated position. Why did the LGBT community campaign hard for him? Why did they vote for him with his opposition to gay marriage? Simple, they knew or at least believed that he was lying, or at least concealing his real progressive views. They believed that his talk about marriage being between a man and a woman was something he had to say. He had to placate the boobs in central Pennsylvania and other parts of rustbelt states in order to win. And of course, the ends justify the means as Harry Reid and Saul Alinsky taught Democrats, so its ok, because in the end Obama won, hope and change prevailed.
So today, another “history making Democrat” Kamala Harris is running for President and to win she will have to make up a lot of stuff, and her party realizes this. She will need a total makeover. Democrats know that her positions pre-July 21, 2024, will not sell with the American people. Of course, they, and the mainstream media want her to defeat the bad orange man, so they know she will have to flip flop and lie and flip and lie and then do some more flip flopping and lying. And the media will give her the latitude to do it, and they will do what they can for her, softball questions and little to no follow-up questions. Calling Dana Bash! Dana we need you, clean up on aisle 5.
Soon after Biden was forced out, I mean voluntarily stepped down, similar to George Washington, and passed the torch to a new generation, she came out in favor of fracking. Won’t this hurt her with the environmentalists. It won’t because they assume she is lying. Harris is in favor of a plan to tax unrealized capital gains, a ruinous policy which makes no economic sense. But her millionaire and billionaire supporters assume she is lying. She told MSNBC that she favored slavery reparations. How can former slave holders pay former slaves when neither are still alive? She never said, or was asked, but the independents that might vote for her assume she is lying.
Harris has said she is opposed to private health insurance, and she favors a government takeover. Wouldn’t this turn off moderate Democrats and independents? Yes, but many just assume she is lying. She simply said that to beat Bernie Sanders in the 2020 Democrat nomination battle. So, no harm no foul.
Harris has supported the idea of abolishing ICE, Immigration, Customs and Naturalization, agency, this in an effort to continue the invasion into our country. Won’t this hurt her with moderate and independents? It would but many just assume she was lying when she first took that position.
What if all of Harris’s policy flips were sincere? What if she was a person of honesty and integrity. What if she really did change her position on building a wall at the southern border? Not a chance.
So, Democrats you have nothing to worry about. She is a liar, so you can trust her.
David Shephard is the Author of a new book, “Norton’s Choice; An Inside Politics Expose.”
8 comments
Great article. Another funny thing, is how the sodomites support Hamas. I have watched, over the years, Blue Dog Democrats go from uninformed to informed and/or exposed for their debase support of the unholy. You have to wonder why people allow themselves to be invested in deception.
Taking a hard look at oneself is indeed challenging. Some would rather support the debase in an effort to cloak their own failings or sin.
C’mon now, at least try to be marginally consistent. You know damn well both candidates lie like hell. And it’s ok, lap it up if you like but you gotta be kidding to be compelled to put this on a public forum and not think you’re going to be ridiculed. Do we really even need to go to the receipts?
Imbeciles. No surprise.
I’m part of her base and I do not know any such thing. However, there are a few things I do know.
1. Trump lost in 2020.
2. Years before Donald Trump seized upon the Big Lie that the 2020 presidential election had been stolen, he insistently promoted another supersized falsehood — namely that charges of Russian interference in the 2016 election were “a hoax.” His minions in the media, from Fox News down to the lowliest web trolls, have incessantly parroted that lie despite the volumes of evidence uncovered by the Senate Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan investigation and the special counsel probe by Robert Mueller.
But now a fresh indictment released by the Justice Department on Sept. 4 shows that the Kremlin conspiracy to rig U.S. elections in favor of the Republican Party is not a liberal myth but a live threat — and that several of the most prominent MAGA media voices denouncing the “hoax” were themselves on the Russian payroll, taking big money.
The indictment describes in detail, with supporting documents translated from Russian, how Kremlin consultants and employees of RT, the state media outlet, directed at least $10 million in funding to a shadowy Tennessee firm known as Tenet Media.
In short, federal investigators caught “Russia, Russia, Russia” — as a mocking Trump likes to say — interfering yet again to prop up his campaign. And just as word of the indictment broke, [he] reiterated his promise to sell out Ukraine for a “peace” plan as soon as he wins election, even before he enters the White House. What Russia spent on Tenet would be pocket change compared with that return on investment.
Once again not a single word that you wrote in this post is true. Not one. Well except for the opening sentence “I am part of her base”. It’s sad that a former Army Officer is willing to abandon and betray the oath of commissioning. You know, the on you took to uphold and defend the Constitution. That is , if you truly were an army officer.
Which causes the most pain: the hook, the line, or the sinker?
Yes, of course, Dave. I’m sure the Russians just LOVE the idea that Trump wants to start aggressively drilling for oil again and restart the Keystone Pipeline, thereby increasing supply and driving prices down. That is just so helpful to their lucrative oil sales business………NOT!
GlockGuy, I was tempted to respond to ‘Dave’. However, I weighed the benefit and found none. If someone is still deceived, when the evil they support is glaringly obvious, they are evidently dead and uncapable of reason. Many of such are invested in their own corruption and have deceived themselves.
Besides, when it comes to these idiots, you never know what you are dealing with. “Dave’ could be some brute dyke that identifies as “Dave”.