When you put a candle next to a box of dynamite, you are taking a risk that something explosive will not happen. Unfortunately, British governments for the past decade or so have ignored the risk. Boom!
For some time, British politicians have been warned about the cultural and ideological implications of massive uncontrolled immigration of tribal Africans and mid-Eastern Muslims. There have been major instances of murder, rape, and other criminal incidents from people in these groups. These incidents were not only ignored by the British government but people who complained often received police visits or even arrests. (If I were living in the British Isles, just this one paragraph would lead to a knock at the door.)
About a week ago, three little British girls from Southport England were murdered and others were severely injured. All they were doing was having a Taylor Swift party outside with their teachers. A 17 year old boy of Rwandan heritage slashed his way into the party leaving chaos and death in his wake.
The native Brits, incensed by the murders, and by the governments refusal to deal with a growing cultural crisis, took to the streets in almost every city in England. They burned police cars, immigration shelters, and Arab stores – and tried to burn down mosques. Muslims, in response, armed themselves and took to the streets looking to attack native Brits. It was open street warfare with thousands of people involved.
The new far left British Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, rather than trying to calm the situation went full dictator threatening the native Brits with arrest and imprisonment. Left out in his threats were references to the armed Muslims roaming the streets and attacking white people at will.
Starmer’s soft on crime and tough on dissent stance now involves the expansion of the National Violent Disorder Programme to allow for mass surveillance by the police. Starmer has vowed to stamp out violent disorder by means that almost any communist state would recognize. He stated that these are not protests nor are they legal, and labeled them an assault on the rule of law and the execution of justice.
To the native Brits who have suffered for many years under the woke policies involving the forced acceptance of abnormal ideologies, the governments answer is Orwellian with ever more big brother insults. (The native Brits are understandably concerned about the growing imposition of sharia law and by a tribal culture that has no relationship to the British Isles. Essentially, they no longer trust the government and are fighting for survival.)
Open borders is not benign. Frankly, what is happening in many Western countries makes the concept of a globalist repopulation and replacement agenda far more believable – and more obvious on a day to day basis.
England is a canary in the mine and we in America should not ignore it.
4 comments
England illustrates how human-rights treaties prove useless. England has no First Amendment, but it has signed the European Convention on Human Rights, which contains free-speech guarantees. However, the European human-rights court interprets those free speech guarantees so narrowly in the context of speech about immigration or other racially-charged topics as to make those guarantees meaningless. Meanwhile, it interprets vague human-rights provisions about respecting people’s family life as barring countries from deporting many criminal immigrants and asylum-seekers. So England has difficulty deporting criminals with bogus asylum claims.
For such a brilliant man, he never understood a clash of cultures. There can only be one winner.
Reference is to Kissinger.
Right before he died at 100, Henry Kissinger, after looking at Germany, remarked maybe trying to mix disparate cultures does not work.
Too late, Henry.