Martha Boneta: Why I’m With Ed

No … nothing to do with gender. And I too support farms with the exercise of Liberty. But I don’t agree in going begging to the state in code for a right we already possess, but fail to exercise. The right to which I refer is the right to farm, to sell the produce of a farm, and do so without the state infringing upon our business, our trade, our means of existence. But all of this is lost on most folks. And for this reason, under the guise of Liberty, the people remain enslaved. Thus, we have a Farm Freedom Movement and yet the ‘Freedom’ is a state grant to slaves to do a certain something. What is won is merely a kind of mock Liberty.

My other gripe here was the whole lack of rigor in Martha’s appeal. It just set me off because if people want to have Liberty, to have government beholding to them because they are the owners of government, then it is mandatory to use the faculty of thinking with a rigor free from lies, deception and non-substantive expression. What I saw in this article was the kind of mendacious thinking, a mendacious thinking that got us into duck soup in the first place.

Thanks for the compliment though not deserved. Quite obviously you are bought into the idea that a strongly held opposite or different view is bullying. This is a common day perception much prevalent in the Land of the Snowflakes. As to your use of Latin, I just cannot see it unless you have gone a bridge too far — as also is the unfortunate custom of the day.

If you can’t follow what I am saying, you have company because 999 out of 1,000 people don’t have the faintest clue as to what I am saying thank you public schooling. And so, given the numbers, why do I bother? For one, reclaiming lost knowledge begins first with an intimation of what one might not know.

Thanks much for bothering to write. I do appreciate that.

Right and Left, like blinders on a horse, are labels meant to keep the people from seeing WHAT IS BEYOND EITHER the Right or the Left. Furthermore, Right and Left have been defined for decades by political and media elites, who as we now know, have been making stuff up out of thin air. And if we pause to think about it more deeply, Left and Right is the Hegelian model of Thesis and Antithesis leading to the desired Synthesis. This model is the favored tool of Marxism for Mind Channeling. That we the people have fallen for this patently absurd modeling is beyond belief; and yet looking back, I too once fell victim.

With exception, I have discounted using Right or Left in any of my writing because it largely serves no greater use than perpetuating minds in bondage to self-styled Masters of the Universe, aka the parasitic elites. My discovery is that at the base, whether Right or Left, the people are equally deceived. That some of these have woken up a tad is to be seen in the crossover vote of Dems voting this cycle for Trump.

There have been no personal grind Martha into the dust attacks here that I can see. But there most assuredly is large scale disagreement as to the virtue of the endorsement and the vacuousness with which it was put forward. And my personal pet peeve is that Martha mistakenly argues for civil rights when the American Law is supposed to be built upon a pillar of Unalienable Rights God-given. There is, of course, a water and oil difference between the two. However this may be, I will grant you that Martha did the best she could, and that her efforts were not a complete waste. And I am glad that she and others nonetheless have with courage resisted tyranny. But I will also say that if we do not deal directly with differences in fundamental law, the elites will have our lunch every day of the week. And this is why I dared to bring up my objections on the score.

The dissenting view here is grounded in the fact that dissenters do not want more of either the program of Marxist Transformation or of State Fascism. And some folks have caught on to the larger fact that these two, also called Right and Left, are roads leading to one Tyrant Rome. As a footnote, please recall that the clarion call of the War for Independence was not Right or Left. It is was Liberty or Death. This is something which we have quite forgotten, and out of our forgetfulness, much mischief arises.

I was, for awhile well known on the western side of Virginia, and to a lesser extent, in the rest of Virginia. I say well known, by this I mean well know in a very, very small restricted circle of people, but one of some influence. I wrote a newsletter sent out under daverkb and daveragt. I was for a few years Vice Chair of the Constitution Party of Virginia. I continually vow to leave off politics for reason having to do with health, but I so very often just get sucked in.

My final statement is that I do not believe that the Gillespie dissenters are as bad as one, or even you, might imagine. They just want something better. And they might not have as yet found a way to get at it, nor the right means of expression.

I thank you for writing and for placing your thoughts in the open. I think that this is an excellent forum in which to carrying such in debate exchange. I don’t belittle your thoughts and doubts because in time past I have done much the same. Our lives our journeys and we change along the way.

This is where the Choo-Choo train goes off the tracks.

Martha and all the Farm Freedom people which I know (and this is not denigration them, believe me! They are good people.) are arguing property rights through law which is little more than Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) which is what the Code of Virginia (CoV) has perversely come to be. Begging for a state grant of ‘property right’ in statute code is not the same as affirming and upholding an unalienable right to property as understood through the Public Law which is the Constitution of Virginia (which in turn is presuppositionally superior and controlling of statute but is not in de facto practice).

I once asked the head of the VCDL, the gun lobby, whether his lobby was doing civil law or unalienable rights law. He rightly answered civil rights law, which I knew to be true. His answer told me that he at least knew the differences in the operation to two disparate, very different and irreconcilable bodies of law. This exchange occurred at a Tea Party meeting in Staunton, Virginia. I did not push the point because I already knew nobody in the audience understood the question. Nonetheless I was totally amazed at the candor of the response.

At this point, allow me to ask a trenchant question regarding property. If people have to beg the state for a grant of right in property, are we then dealing with property in the first place, or is it instead leasehold? There is a world of difference in the two.

This may come as a shock to you, but people do not own much property in any of the united States anymore. They have instead a ‘right’ to the beneficial use to property held in trust. There is a reason why the scrape of paper they issue you for ‘paid in full real estate’ is called a Deed of TRUST. Even the car dealership will not issue a sales invoice. No, you do not get a Title of Ownership. Instead, it is a Certificate of Title. And these are only two big examples of something amiss in the Happy Land of Property Ownership.

I would say that folks have a lot to learn, and if they knew the half of it, there would be a revolution over night, as Henry Ford put it.

Okay! Here we are again! You say you see my point. And I say back to you, “Maybe the door is now opened a crack, but that is all.” But why do I say that?

I looked at the article. And just scanning through it, it looks all right at first glance (but it really has a lot of mischief in it which requires a lot of training to spot). And yes, we agree Martha went through hell. And there is mention of ‘property rights’ and of a citizen’s struggle for high ground is on display. And I can easily understand why the public is sucked into what Trump rightly calls The Rigged System, believing that we have no other options.

First point: when you go into court these days, the judge never tells you what kind of law court you are in. You think you know. You may think you are in Family Court, Traffic Court, Federal District Court, etc., and the judge is happy to let you think that you are in whatever court you think you are in so long as you consent to be under his authority. What the judge never wants you to understand is in what kind of court you are in BY OPERATION OF THE LAW. And he never wants you to question the court’s STANDING to hear your case. In short, you are never to question JURISDICTION; and if you do question jurisdiction, you better had be prepared for the next coming judicial onslaught. If have just read these few sentences and you find yourself left scratching your head, not understanding what I am saying, this is the way it is meant to be by systemic design. In The Rigged System to which president-elect Trump alludes, you are meant to be deceived, left in the dark about anything which may elevate your position in life. And by the way, anyone who lets a fly of truth out of the jar? Immediately a tin hat is placed upon his crown. The Rigged System, whether it’s the courts, legislative bodies, central banking and you name it, best to keep the people in the dark because if the people get to know something, things might get out of hand.

Lawyers? First off, Christ was right tell people have nothing to do with lawyers, serpents one and all. And regarding lawyers like the constitutional lawyer writing the article? You may have heard that constitutional lawyers have not studied constitutional law for over a hundred years now. They study precedent in The Rigged System, and believe me, this is nothing at all like the Law John Adams’ studied in America of the 18th century. And no lawyer is going to tell you anything at all about The Rigged System because that is where the money is. But interestingly, when I queried lawyers on the law, I was totally surprised at the number of them that would admit the law as now practiced is a crooked system. And the most interesting part of all is that if I got talking and the lawyer became wary of where the conversation was leading, none of them would deny what I was saying. Instead, they do what lawyers always do when confronted with inconvenient truths of the uncomfortable sort. They simply evaded my line of talk. Talking to lawyers and testing out reactions, responses, this was a big part of my validation that what I had come to know about legality, the Law and the political system was largely the Gospel Truth, so to speak.

From the beginnings of America in the 17th century onwards, through the period of the constitutions, and up until the time when Hillary’s beloved Progressive-ism began to get its hands around the throats of the American people, the American farmer took his produce to market free and clear of the state. The farmer did so in Liberty as one of the people, not as a citizen. And this is important, know that people and citizen are not identities. They are not the same thing. People have unalienable rights arising out of grant from God and the people operate in a jurisdiction separate from the state. I repeat … JURISDICTION SEPARATE FROM THE STATE. No lawyer will tell you this, but John Adams knew this was so because one of this railings before the Massachusetts High Court involved the complaint that the Crown was transferring Colonists outside of Liberty into Courts of Admiralty. Outside of Liberty means from a jurisdiction into which the state cannot infringe into a jurisdiction (Admiralty) in which state has absolute authority over a citizen, including grants so made by sovereign (crown) authority.

This is essentially what has happen to us in our present situation. We have been transferred out of Liberty and into a system that operates under a presumption which is a facsimile of Admiralty Court. We have been stripped of people-sovereigns-owners-of government status and been transferred over into citizen-subject status. Yes, we still play The Constitutional Rights Word Game, but we are doing it under a false pretense expressly fashioned and styled so as to perpetuate the crooked Rigged System. To reiterate, the Rigged System operates under Word deception as well as outright falsification of the Truth. And by the way, I would not have known anything of this excepting for the Internet, every bit as liberating as was the Gutenberg printing press.

I know that I have not answered you adequately. How could I? It is impossible to overcome one hundred years plus of disinformation in a few paragraphs. Only a fool would so attempt. But let me leave you with one thought, if you possess a Right such as the Declaration of Independence so makes known, and the law dictionary says that right is incapable of being bought or sold or transferred away from the possessor of said right, it is the logical that one would have to beg the state to restore the right? The state cannot restore what is pre-existing to the state and not granted by the state, not its creation. Also, can a people be regulated, dictated to in their business and still be sovereign, meaning sovereign and owners of government? This last seem lost on a populace which has lost its way. Owners instruct their government, are not instructed, regulated coerced or dictated to by government.

Again, this is more background. If you care to write to me directly, you may. You only need to ask.